Exposing Safety Concerns: A Deep Dive into Tesla and Whistleblowing

Former Tesla employee Luckaz Krupski has recently made shocking revelations about safety concerns, vehicle production issues, and internal cybersecurity at the renowned electric carmaker. As part of a team responsible for preparing Teslas for delivery to Norwegian customers, Krupski risked his life when he extinguished a fire caused by a faulty charging device at a motor show in Oslo in 2019. Despite being hailed a hero by CEO Elon Musk at the time, Krupski faced mistreatment and inaction when he reported safety concerns within the company.

Krupski’s frustration with the lackluster response to his concerns led him to leak critical information to German business paper Handelsblatt. The data he provided highlighted thousands of accident reports, manufacturing challenges with the Cybertruck pickup, and internal communications that exposed flaws in Tesla’s Autopilot driver-assistance software. This software, designed to make cars safer, raised questions about the effectiveness of Tesla’s technology and the potential risks it posed to drivers.

In addition to safety issues, Krupski also disclosed the personal information of Tesla employees, including Elon Musk. This breach of privacy shed light on the company’s inadequate internal cybersecurity protocols. As a result, the Data Protection Authority in the Netherlands is now investigating whether Tesla violated privacy laws.

Krupski’s case not only exposes internal problems within Tesla but also highlights the limitations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) whistleblower program. Despite providing information about potential securities violations by Tesla to the SEC, Krupski may not qualify for a whistleblower award due to the controversial rule that disqualifies individuals who first report to the media or other government agencies. This emphasizes the need for greater employee education about whistleblower protections and the importance of reporting information through the appropriate channels.

Furthermore, Krupski’s story reveals the troubling culture of retaliation within Tesla. After expressing his safety concerns directly to Elon Musk, Krupski faced questioning of his performance and ultimately experienced threats and harassment from co-workers. Tesla’s response to the situation was to accuse Krupski of misappropriating company information and terminate his employment for alleged misconduct.

As Krupski moves forward from this ordeal, he hopes that his whistleblowing will lead to positive change within Tesla and the industry as a whole. His bravery in speaking out against safety issues and cybersecurity vulnerabilities serves as a reminder of the importance of holding companies accountable for their actions. It is crucial for whistleblowers to receive adequate protection and support when raising concerns about potential misconduct.


Q: What safety concerns were raised by Luckaz Krupski?

A: Luckaz Krupski raised safety concerns about the lack of fire extinguishers, improper handling of flammable materials, and inadequate safety briefings for employees at Tesla’s Norwegian operation.

Q: What information was leaked by Krupski?

A: Krupski shared accident reports, manufacturing challenges with the Cybertruck pickup, and internal communications regarding flaws in Tesla’s Autopilot driver-assistance software. He also leaked personal information, including social security numbers, of Tesla employees.

Q: What limitations does the SEC whistleblower program have?

A: The SEC’s whistleblower program disqualifies individuals who first report potential misconduct to the media, other government agencies, or foreign law enforcement before reporting to the SEC, considering them “involuntary” whistleblowers.

Q: How did Tesla respond to Krupski’s concerns?

A: Tesla responded to Krupski’s concerns by questioning his performance, threatening and harassing him, and eventually terminating his employment.

Q: What impact did Krupski’s whistleblowing have on his personal life?

A: Krupski’s whistleblowing led to depression, anxiety, and sleeplessness. However, he expressed relief at no longer being anonymous and a renewed sense of motivation.